Lord v. Wentworth

36 A. 17, 68 N.H. 610
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Trespass, guare clausum. March 11, .1875, Nathaniel.Willey owned a large rectangular lot of land bounded westerly by the “old road” and southerly by the “ new road.” In the corner formed by the junction of the two roads was a nearly square tract of about four acres called the Webster homestead, bounded westerly twenty-five rods on the “ old road ” and southerly twenty-six rods on the “ new road.” On that day he conveyed to Mary Webster a tract of land bounded and described as follows: “ Commencing at the junction of the two roads, thence running northerly on the old road about eighteen rods to a large stone opposite to my barn; thence easterly, parallel with the fence between my pasture and the Webster homestead, to a point far enough east to contain eight acres between said fence and the new road; thence southerly to the new road; and thence westerly on the new road to the bound begun at; meaning to convey the former homestead of the late Horace Webster.” The plaintiff excepted to the ruling that the deed conveyed to Mary the eight-acre tract and not merely the Webster homestead, and the exception was overruled.

Chase, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lord v. Wentworth, 36 A. 17, 68 N.H. 610 (N.H. 1895).

36 A. 17 (Lord v. Wentworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Estate of Orwig
185 Iowa 913 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)