Lord v. Susquehanna Silk Mills
260 A.D. 1015, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. (See Kissel v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. R. Co., 126 App. Div. 852; Western R. R. Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513; Restatement of the Law of Trusts, § 282.) Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lord v. Susquehanna Silk Mills, 260 A.D. 1015, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
260 A.D. 1015 (Lord v. Susquehanna Silk Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Bacon
262 A.D. 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)