Lord v. State

20 N.H. 404
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 N.H. 404 (Lord v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lord v. State, 20 N.H. 404 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Gilchrist, J.

The indictment should contain a description of the pieces of silver stolen. ' In Rex v. Fry, cited in Russell on Crimes 109, it was held that “ten pounds in monies numbered,” was bad upon a motion in arrest of judgment.

In this State, in the county of Carroll, it has lately been held, that “ sundry pieces of silver coin, current by law within this State, amounting together to the sum of twelve dollars, of the goods, chattels and monies of &c.,” was an insufficient description of property alleged to have been stolen.

The authorities show that a defect of this kind is not cured by a verdict, and by reason of it the judgment must be reversed; and it is unnecessary to inquire into the other ground of error.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Baker, Alias Bland, Alias Drew
138 A. 736 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 N.H. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-state-nhsuperct-1845.