Lord v. State

20 N.H. 404
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided January 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilchrist, J.

The indictment should contain a description of the pieces of silver stolen. ' In Rex v. Fry, cited in Russell on Crimes 109, it was held that “ten pounds in monies numbered,” was bad upon a motion in arrest of judgment.

In this State, in the county of Carroll, it has lately been held, that “ sundry pieces of silver coin, current by law within this State, amounting together to the sum of twelve dollars, of the goods, chattels and monies of &c.,” was an insufficient description of property alleged to have been stolen.

The authorities show that a defect of this kind is not cured by a verdict, and by reason of it the judgment must be reversed; and it is unnecessary to inquire into the other ground of error.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lord v. State, 20 N.H. 404 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1845).

20 N.H. 404 (Lord v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Baker, Alias Bland, Alias Drew
138 A. 736 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1927)