Lord v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lord v. State

137 So. 922, 24 Ala. App. 660

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 10, 1931

Docket4 Div. 803.

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 922 (Lord v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lord v. State, 137 So. 922, 24 Ala. App. 660 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the November term, 1930, of the circuit court of Covington county, Ala., the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant charging him with the offense of murder in the first degree for the killing by him of one Clyde Stewart by cutting him with a knife.

*661 On February 23, 1931, the appellant was put to trial upon said indictment and was convicted of the offense of manslaughter in the first degree. In accordance with the verdict of the jury, the court sentenced him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of four years. Judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed, as there is no error apparent upon the record, and on the record only is this appeal rested.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the November term, 1930, of the circuit court of Covington county, Ala., the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant charging him with the offense of murder in the first degree for the killing by him of one Clyde Stewart by cutting him with a knife.

*661 On February 23, 1931, the appellant was put to trial upon said indictment and was convicted of the offense of manslaughter in the first degree. In accordance with the verdict of the jury, the court sentenced him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of four years. Judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed, as there is no error apparent upon the record, and on the record only is this appeal rested.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 922, 24 Ala. App. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-state-alactapp-1931.