Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co.

148 F. 19, 78 C.C.A. 493, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJuly 24, 1906
DocketNo. 629
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 F. 19 (Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co., 148 F. 19, 78 C.C.A. 493, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301 (1st Cir. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM-.

The court having fully considered the petition filed by the defendant, appellant, on June 21, 1906, for leave to proceed further in the court below, on account of alleged newly-discovered evidence, and being clearly of the opinion that the alleged newly-discovered evidence is of a class of evidence which was always within the reach of the defendant, appellant, by the use of ordinary diligence, and, also, being of the opinion that it is immaterial because it relates to sheet metal spring supports:

It is ordered that the petition be, and the same is hereby, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolf v. Buckeye Incubator Co.
296 F. 680 (Sixth Circuit, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 F. 19, 78 C.C.A. 493, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-staples-hanford-co-ca1-1906.