Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co.

First Circuit

Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co.

148 F. 19, 78 C.C.A. 493, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 24, 1906·No. No. 629·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM-.

The court having fully considered the petition filed by the defendant, appellant, on June 21, 1906, for leave to proceed further in the court below, on account of alleged newly-discovered evidence, and being clearly of the opinion that the alleged newly-discovered evidence is of a class of evidence which was always within the reach of the defendant, appellant, by the use of ordinary diligence, and, also, being of the opinion that it is immaterial because it relates to sheet metal spring supports:

It is ordered that the petition be, and the same is hereby, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM-.

The court having fully considered the petition filed by the defendant, appellant, on June 21, 1906, for leave to proceed further in the court below, on account of alleged newly-discovered evidence, and being clearly of the opinion that the alleged newly-discovered evidence is of a class of evidence which was always within the reach of the defendant, appellant, by the use of ordinary diligence, and, also, being of the opinion that it is immaterial because it relates to sheet metal spring supports:

It is ordered that the petition be, and the same is hereby, denied.

Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co., 148 F. 19, 78 C.C.A. 493, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301 (1st Cir. 1906).

Pincite

148 F. 19 (Lord v. Staples & Hanford Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related