Lord v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles

190 N.E.2d 893, 346 Mass. 764, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lord v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles. Read the opinion of the Court — 347 Mass. 608
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 31, 1963·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed. This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the registrar of motor vehicles for the Commonwealth to “allow” the petitioner to inspect the report of [765]*765an operator of a vehicle involved in a collision. The record reveals the following statement by the judge below: “I find by the petitioner’s admission in open court at the hearing . . . that petitioner has had the opportunity to inspect, and has in fact inspected, the report referred to in the within petition to the extent herein demanded. Accordingly, the petition is hereby dismissed.” The judge rightly exercised his discretion.

Herbert Lord, pro se. James J. Kelleher, Assistant Attorney General, for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lord v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles, 190 N.E.2d 893, 346 Mass. 764, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 756 (Mass. 1963).

190 N.E.2d 893 (Lord v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.