Lord v. Lowry

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Lord v. Lowry

8 S.C. Eq. 510

DecidedApril 15, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 8 S.C. Eq. 510 (Lord v. Lowry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lord v. Lowry, 8 S.C. Eq. 510 (S.C. Ct. App. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

Johnson, J.

All the grounds urged in argument turn upon the question of fact, whether there was a copartnership between Jacob N. Lord, and David Sealy, and when it was dissolved.- The evidence as to that fact is certainly involved in much doubt; but that furnishes, perhaps, the best reason, why this Court should riot review the Chancellor’s determination of it. His decree is, therefore,, affirmed.

O’Neall, J., and Harper, J., concurred,

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson, J.

All the grounds urged in argument turn upon the question of fact, whether there was a copartnership between Jacob N. Lord, and David Sealy, and when it was dissolved.- The evidence as to that fact is certainly involved in much doubt; but that furnishes, perhaps, the best reason, why this Court should riot review the Chancellor’s determination of it. His decree is, therefore,, affirmed.

O’Neall, J., and Harper, J., concurred,

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 S.C. Eq. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-lowry-scctapp-1831.