Lord v. Kobata
This text of Lord v. Kobata (Lord v. Kobata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 18-APR-2023 11:02 AM Dkt. 25 ORD
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI _______________________________________________________________ ESTATE OF VIVIAN T. LORD, by her PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAM H. GILLIAM; and WILLIAM H. GILLIAM individually, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. LESLIE KOBATA, REGISTRAR, in his official capacity only; PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA & CHOW, LLP; PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA, LLP; FOREST B. JENKINS; CHONG, NISHIMOTO, SIA, NAKAMURA & GOYA, LLLP; JEFFREY H.K. SIA; DOROTHY P.H. MEISNER; SHANA MAGUIRE; HAWAII FIRST, INC.; CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT, INC., dba ASSOCIA, HAWAII; and ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KUHIO SHORES AT POIPU, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. ___________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of Nakayama, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Souza, in place of Wilson, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the document filed on February
21, 2023, it is ordered:
1. The application for a writ of certiorari is
rejected. 2. The petition for a writ of mandamus or
prohibition is denied. Petitioners have alternative means to
seek relief because 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX is ongoing and the vexatious
litigant order and order addressing attorney fees and costs may
be reviewed on appeal. Petitioners have also not demonstrated a
clear and indisputable right to relief because it is within the
circuit court’s jurisdiction and discretion to decide the motion
for attorney fees and costs. An extraordinary writ is thus not
warranted. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d
334, 338-39 (1999); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw.
237, 241–42, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978).
3. The request for a stay is denied. If and when
appropriate, Petitioners may seek a stay in the circuit court
pursuant to Hawaiʻi Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 62 and Hawaiʻi
Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 8.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 18, 2023.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
/s/ Kevin A.K. Souza
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lord v. Kobata, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-kobata-haw-2023.