Lord v. Clark

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Lord v. Clark

31 Mass. 223

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Mass. 223 (Lord v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lord v. Clark, 31 Mass. 223 (Mass. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

[224]*224The Court held, that the amendments related to matters of form ; that the first clause struck out was senseless ; that the second clause was mere descriptio personae ; Buffum v. Chadwick, 8 Mass. R. 103 ; Hardy v. Call, 16 Mass. R. 530 ; Clark v. Low, 15 Mass. R. 476 ; that both clauses might be rejected as surplusage ; that without the amendments the same judgment might have been rendered against Wilson ; and that the bail were not discharged.

Defendants defaulted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[224]*224The Court held, that the amendments related to matters of form ; that the first clause struck out was senseless ; that the second clause was mere descriptio personae ; Buffum v. Chadwick, 8 Mass. R. 103 ; Hardy v. Call, 16 Mass. R. 530 ; Clark v. Low, 15 Mass. R. 476 ; that both clauses might be rejected as surplusage ; that without the amendments the same judgment might have been rendered against Wilson ; and that the bail were not discharged.

Defendants defaulted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Mass. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-v-clark-mass-1833.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack