Lord & Taylor v. United States

Second Circuit

Lord & Taylor v. United States

178 F. 270, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4507

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 1910

DocketNo. 153 (5,466)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 F. 270 (Lord & Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lord & Taylor v. United States, 178 F. 270, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4507 (2d Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The various authorities relied upon by appellants are referred to in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers. G. A. 5,018 (T. D. 23,348). The question is a close one, but we are of the opinion that it would extend these authorities too far to hold that a woven fabric which contains 37 per cent, of jute is a “woven fabric of cotton,” which is the definition of cotton cloth given in paragraph 310.

The decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The various authorities relied upon by appellants are referred to in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers. G. A. 5,018 (T. D. 23,348). The question is a close one, but we are of the opinion that it would extend these authorities too far to hold that a woven fabric which contains 37 per cent, of jute is a “woven fabric of cotton,” which is the definition of cotton cloth given in paragraph 310.

The decision is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 F. 270, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-taylor-v-united-states-ca2-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack