Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.

18 F. App'x 147

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2001·No. 01-1077·Unpublished·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, and Linda, Lady of Shalford, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in this diversity action. We have reviewed *148 the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lord of Shalford v. Shelley’s Jewelry, Inc., No. CA-99-162-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, and Linda, Lady of Shalford, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in this diversity action. We have reviewed *148 the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lord of Shalford v. Shelley’s Jewelry, Inc., No. CA-99-162-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc., 18 F. App'x 147 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

18 F. App'x 147 (Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related