Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.

18 F. App'x 147
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 10, 2001
Docket01-1077
StatusUnpublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 18 F. App'x 147 (Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc., 18 F. App'x 147 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, and Linda, Lady of Shalford, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in this diversity action. We have reviewed *148 the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lord of Shalford v. Shelley’s Jewelry, Inc., No. CA-99-162-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. App'x 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lord-of-shalford-v-shelleys-jewelry-inc-ca4-2001.