Lord Family of Windsor, LLC. v. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission of the Town of Windsor
933 A.2d 726, 284 Conn. 926, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 465
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 354 (AC 27906), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record did not contain substantial evidence to sustain the named defendant’s denial of the plaintiffs’ application?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lord Family of Windsor, LLC. v. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission of the Town of Windsor, 933 A.2d 726, 284 Conn. 926, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 465 (Colo. 2007).
933 A.2d 726 (Lord Family of Windsor, LLC. v. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission of the Town of Windsor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
954 A.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)