Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co.

187 A.D.2d 568, 590 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13076

This text of 187 A.D.2d 568 (Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co., 187 A.D.2d 568, 590 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover money owed under a management contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated September 19, 1990, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action asserted in the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[569]*569Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (see, Cardone v Cardone, 185 AD2d 869). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardone v. Cardone
185 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 568, 590 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorber-v-barry-a-glasser-co-nyappdiv-1992.