Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co.

187 A.D.2d 568, 590 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13076

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1992·Published

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover money owed under a management contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated September 19, 1990, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action asserted in the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[569] Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (see, Cardone v Cardone, 185 AD2d 869). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover money owed under a management contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated September 19, 1990, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action asserted in the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[569] Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (see, Cardone v Cardone, 185 AD2d 869). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co., 187 A.D.2d 568, 590 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

187 A.D.2d 568 (Lorber v. Barry A. Glasser & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related