Lorbach v. Madeira-Mamore Railway Co.
This text of 159 A.D. 923 (Lorbach v. Madeira-Mamore Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the complaint sufficiently definite and certain. The matter in the complaint objected to as irrelevant is not sufficiently [924]*924so, if at all, to justify its being stricken out. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, With ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 A.D. 923, 144 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorbach-v-madeira-mamore-railway-co-nyappdiv-1913.