Loran Fredric v. Brooke Fredric

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2025
Docket03-25-00897-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Loran Fredric v. Brooke Fredric (Loran Fredric v. Brooke Fredric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loran Fredric v. Brooke Fredric, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00897-CV

Loran Fredric, Appellant

v.

Brooke Fredric, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-FM-23-002306, THE HONORABLE LAURIE EISERLOH, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Loran Fredric has filed a notice of appeal. On December 8, 2025,

appellant filed in this Court a “Motion for Reporter’s Record at No Cost and to Enforce

Indigency Determination.” Fredric notifies the Court that he filed a Statement of Indigency in

the trial court on November 25, 2025, and the clerk’s record contains a file-stamped copy of that

Statement, which was also attached to his motion. In his motion, Fredric requests that we order

the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record without payment of costs because she has

informed him that the trial court instructed her not to prepare the record unless payment is made.

The court reporter also informed us in the status report that she filed with this Court that “[a]fter

reviewing appellant’s Statement of Inability to [P]ay, Judge Eiserloh did not approve payment by

the county for the record.”

We abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a determination, if

necessary, of appellant’s ability to afford payment of court costs under Rule 145 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 (governing when payment of costs is not

required). Any motion to require appellant to pay costs or to require appellant to prove inability

to afford costs must be filed in the trial court by the appropriate party in accordance with Rule

145. See id. R. 145(e)(1). The trial court “on its own may require the declarant to prove the

inability to afford costs when evidence comes before the court that the declarant may be able to

afford costs or when an officer or professional must be appointed in the case.” See id. R.

145(e)(2). “The declarant must not be required to pay costs without an oral evidentiary hearing.”

Id. R. 145(f)(1).

If necessary, the trial court shall conduct a hearing on any such motion and make

appropriate findings and orders. See id. R. 145(f)(1)-(4). Any and all documents filed and

orders signed pursuant to Rule 145 shall be forwarded to this Court for filing as a supplemental

record no later than February 2, 2026. Alternatively, a party, the trial-court clerk, or the court

reporter may file a status report informing this Court that additional time is needed for a

determination under Rule 145. In the absence of a request for additional time, this Court will

reinstate this appeal on February 3, 2026. Upon reinstatement, if an order requiring appellant to

pay costs has not been signed, appellant will be entitled to proceed without payment of the costs

associated with this appeal. See id. R. 145(a).

It is so ordered on December 19, 2025.

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Theofanis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: December 19, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Loran Fredric v. Brooke Fredric, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loran-fredric-v-brooke-fredric-texapp-2025.