Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co.

44 F. App'x 491
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2002
DocketNo. 02-1363
StatusPublished

This text of 44 F. App'x 491 (Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., 44 F. App'x 491 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Loral Fairchild Corporation’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, and Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc.’s motion to reform the caption,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) The motion to reform the caption is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above.

(3) All parties shall bear their own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loral-fairchild-corp-v-matsushita-electrical-industrial-co-cafc-2002.