Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co.

Federal Circuit

Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co.

44 F. App'x 491

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 2, 2002·No. No. 02-1363·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Loral Fairchild Corporation’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, and Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc.’s motion to reform the caption,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) The motion to reform the caption is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above.

(3) All parties shall bear their own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Loral Fairchild Corporation’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, and Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc.’s motion to reform the caption,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) The motion to reform the caption is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above.

(3) All parties shall bear their own costs.

Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., 44 F. App'x 491 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

44 F. App'x 491 (Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.