Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Fernandez

728 N.E.2d 1056, 89 Ohio St. 3d 82
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2000·No. No. 99-2265·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Absent mitigating circumstances, an indefinite suspension from the practice of law is an appropriate sanction when an attorney engages in a pattern of neglect involving multiple clients and refuses to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigations. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 219, 221, 718 N.E.2d 1277, 1279. No mitigating factors are evident that would warrant a lesser sanction for respondent’s reprehensible conduct here. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

[85] Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Fernandez, 728 N.E.2d 1056, 89 Ohio St. 3d 82 (Ohio 2000).

728 N.E.2d 1056 (Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Paulson
111 Ohio St. 3d 415 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Fernandez
793 N.E.2d 434 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kieft
2002 Ohio 1234 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Fernandez
2000 Ohio 112 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)