Lora v. United States Department of Justice

Fourth Circuit

Lora v. United States Department of Justice

582 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. 14-6576·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) motion and subsequent Motion to Alter or Amend the Records. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Serv., No. 1:02-cv-01507-LMB (E.D.Va. filed & entered Feb. 11, 2014; filed Feb. 28 & entered Mar. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) motion and subsequent Motion to Alter or Amend the Records. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Serv., No. 1:02-cv-01507-LMB (E.D.Va. filed & entered Feb. 11, 2014; filed Feb. 28 & entered Mar. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lora v. United States Department of Justice, 582 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

582 F. App'x 213 (Lora v. United States Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.