Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corporation

Eleventh Circuit

Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corporation

98 F.3d 618, 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1083, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27793, 1996 WL 585401

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 28, 1996·No. 94-2516·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On June 26, 1996, the Supreme Court reversed this panel’s opinion in Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc., 56 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir.1995). See Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now reverse the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint and remand the ease to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On June 26, 1996, the Supreme Court reversed this panel’s opinion in Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc., 56 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir.1995). See Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now reverse the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint and remand the ease to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, 98 F.3d 618, 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1083, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27793, 1996 WL 585401 (11th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

98 F.3d 618 (Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related