Loque v. Hancock County

68 S.E. 866, 8 Ga. App. 208, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 99
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 6, 1910·No. 2550·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The questions raised in this record are fully controlled by the decision of this court in Wright v. Sheppard, 5 Ga. App. 298 (63 S. E. 48), and the decision of the Supreme Court in Maxwell v. Willis, 123 Ga. 319 (51 S. E. 416).

2. An assignment of error making what purports to he a constitutional question, in the following language: “Because the provisions of the statute [meaning- the alternative road slatute] authorizing such tax was unconstitutional,” is too general to raise a constitutional question [209]*209for certification to tlie Supreme Court. Tooke v. State, 4 Ga. App. 495 (61 S. E. 917). Judgment affirmed.

Decided September 6, 1910. Certiorari; from Hancock superior court — Judge Lewis. September 27, 1909. R. H. Leiuis, for plaintiffs in error. IF. H. Burwell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loque v. Hancock County, 68 S.E. 866, 8 Ga. App. 208, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 99 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 866 (Loque v. Hancock County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garland v. State of Georgia
114 S.E.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Brown v. City of Valdosta
172 S.E. 72 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)