Lopresti v. Haseko

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lopresti v. Haseko. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 Haw. 89
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2025·No. CAAP-19-0000725·Published

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-AUG-2025 10:52 AM Dkt. 631 OAWST

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

MATTHEW LOPRESTI, JULIA LOPRESTI, ROBERT JOHNSON, REGENA JOHNSON, KYLE MCKEE, MARITES MCKEE, EMIL GOCONG, LIZ GOCONG, KENNETH TYLER, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. HASEKO (HAWAII), INC.; HASEKO (EWA), INC.; HASEKO DEVELOPMENT, INC.; HASEKO HOMES, INC.; HASEKO INVESTMENTS, INC.; HASEKO REALTY (HAWAII), INC.; HOAKALEI; HOAKALEI CORPORATION; HOAKALEI DEVELOPMENT, LLC; and HOAKALEI RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CC131001995)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL WITH PREJUDICE (By: Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Dismiss

Appeal (Stipulation), filed on August 20, 2025, pursuant to

Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), and the

record, it appears that: NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(1) the filing fees have been paid and the appeal has

been docketed;

(2) the Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants Matthew

Lopresti, Julia Lopresti, Robert Johnson, Regena Johnson, Kyle

McKee, Marites McKee, Emil Gocong, Liz Gocong, and Kenneth

Tyler, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated

(Plaintiffs), and the Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

Haseko (Hawaii), Inc.; Haseko (Ewa), Inc.; Haseko Development,

Inc.; Haseko Homes, Inc.; Haseko Investments, Inc.; Haseko

Realty (Hawaii), Inc.; Hoakalei; Hoakalei Corporation; Hoakalei

Development, LLC; and Hoakalei Residential, LLC stipulate to

dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys'

fees and costs associated with this appeal;

(3) the Stipulation is signed by counsel for all

parties appearing in this appeal;

(4) as a result of the Stipulation, the Plaintiffs'

October 10, 2024 "Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and

Costs," October 28, 2024 "Motion for Instruction on Post

Judgment Interest," October 28, 2024 "Motion for Pre-Judgment

Interest," and November 8, 2024 "Motion for Authorization to

File Reply Memoranda Regarding Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment

2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Interest Pursuant to HRAP 27" (collectively, the Motions),

appear to be moot.1

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation

is approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The

parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in this

appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions are denied as

moot.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 29, 2025.

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

1 See Cmty. Ass'ns of Hualalai, Inc. v. Leeward Plan. Comm'n, 150 Hawaiʻi 241, 253, 500 P.3d 426, 438 (2021) ("[A] case is moot if the reviewing court can no longer grant effective relief.") (cleaned up).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopresti v. Haseko, (hawapp 2025).

Lopresti v. Haseko (Lopresti v. Haseko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.