Lopoczyk v. McIntyre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lopoczyk v. McIntyre

9 A.D.2d 690, 192 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 690 (Lopoczyk v. McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopoczyk v. McIntyre, 9 A.D.2d 690, 192 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution and a motion to dismiss the cross complaint of the respondent McIntyre against the respondent Sampino. Order insofar as it dismisses the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order insofar as it dismisses the cross complaint dismissed, without costs. The appellants are not aggrieved by the dismissal of the cross complaint. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution and a motion to dismiss the cross complaint of the respondent McIntyre against the respondent Sampino. Order insofar as it dismisses the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order insofar as it dismisses the cross complaint dismissed, without costs. The appellants are not aggrieved by the dismissal of the cross complaint. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 690, 192 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopoczyk-v-mcintyre-nyappdiv-1959.