Lopo v. Saks Fifth Avenue
395 U.S. 211, 89 S. Ct. 1773, 23 L. Ed. 2d 214, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1516
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopo v. Saks Fifth Avenue, 395 U.S. 211, 89 S. Ct. 1773, 23 L. Ed. 2d 214, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1516 (1969).
395 U.S. 211 (Lopo v. Saks Fifth Avenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross
654 So. 2d 1311 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)
Buhl v. Hannigan
16 Cal. App. 4th 1612 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. State
488 N.W.2d 533 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
Picou v. Gillum
874 F.2d 1519 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
David L. Picou v. Jim Gillum, Sheriff of Pasco County and James T. Russell, State Attorney
874 F.2d 1519 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
People v. Kohrig
498 N.E.2d 1158 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1986)
Doris Armstrong v. Benjamin Ward, Commissioner of Correctional Services
529 F.2d 1132 (Second Circuit, 1976)
People v. Henninger
328 N.E.2d 580 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Cesin v. State
288 So. 2d 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Sevin v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n
283 So. 2d 690 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)