LoPiccolo v. Milea Associates
This text of 295 A.D.2d 575 (LoPiccolo v. Milea Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant first and second third-party plaintiff, Milea Associates, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated April 11, 2001, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) and denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6), and for common-law indemnification against third-party defendant City of New York and the second third-party defendant, Bruno G.M.C. Truck Sales, Inc.
Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary [576]*576judgment. Santucci, J.P., Altman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 A.D.2d 575, 744 N.Y.S.2d 702, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopiccolo-v-milea-associates-nyappdiv-2002.