Lopez v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lopez v. Wing

280 A.D.2d 480, 719 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1309

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 480 (Lopez v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. Wing, 280 A.D.2d 480, 719 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated January 11, 1999, which, after a fair hearing, confirmed the denial of the petitioner’s application for an emergency assistance grant for rent arrears.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The fair hearing determination that, at the time the petitioner was denied an emergency assistance grant for rent arrears, he was unable to make future rent payments as required by 18 NYCRR 352.7 (g) (3) (see, Matter of Perez v Wing, 263 AD2d 391; Matter of Hawkins v Commissioner of N. Y. State Dept. of Social Servs., 161 AD2d 377) is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135; Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland, 282 NY 256).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated January 11, 1999, which, after a fair hearing, confirmed the denial of the petitioner’s application for an emergency assistance grant for rent arrears.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The fair hearing determination that, at the time the petitioner was denied an emergency assistance grant for rent arrears, he was unable to make future rent payments as required by 18 NYCRR 352.7 (g) (3) (see, Matter of Perez v Wing, 263 AD2d 391; Matter of Hawkins v Commissioner of N. Y. State Dept. of Social Servs., 161 AD2d 377) is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135; Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland, 282 NY 256).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 480, 719 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-wing-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack