Lopez v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

311 F.3d 928

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lopez v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 302 F.3d 900 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2002·No. No. 01-15303·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 6, 2002, and appearing at 302 F.3d 900 (9th Cir.2002), is amended as follows:

At page 905, second column, first full paragraph, the second sentence that reads “Prison inmates do not voluntarily open accounts with the prison, do not have the option of receiving their benefits directly and do not voluntarily execute contractual agreements regarding how overdrafts will be treated” is deleted.

With this amendment, Judges Nelson and Noonan have recommended denying the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and Judge Hawkins has voted to deny the En Banc Petition.

The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 6, 2002, and appearing at 302 F.3d 900 (9th Cir.2002), is amended as follows:

With this amendment, Judges Nelson and Noonan have recommended denying the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and Judge Hawkins has voted to deny the En Banc Petition.

The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Lopez v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., 311 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

311 F.3d 928 (Lopez v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.