Lopez v. Velasco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lopez v. Velasco

861 So. 2d 84, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2003 WL 22669012

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 13, 2003

DocketNo. 1D02-4846

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 861 So. 2d 84 (Lopez v. Velasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. Velasco, 861 So. 2d 84, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2003 WL 22669012 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Workers’ Compensation case, the claimant’s counsel seeks review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims that, without more, informed the parties that the judge did not find reasonable and would not approve the amount of attorneys’ fees sought in connection with the parties’ lump-sum settlement and side stipulation thereto. Upon further consideration of the claimant’s response to this Court’s order to demonstrate why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, we conclude that the JCC’s order is interlocutory and is not appeal-able. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180.

Appeal dismissed.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Workers’ Compensation case, the claimant’s counsel seeks review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims that, without more, informed the parties that the judge did not find reasonable and would not approve the amount of attorneys’ fees sought in connection with the parties’ lump-sum settlement and side stipulation thereto. Upon further consideration of the claimant’s response to this Court’s order to demonstrate why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, we conclude that the JCC’s order is interlocutory and is not appeal-able. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180.

Appeal dismissed.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 84, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2003 WL 22669012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-velasco-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack