Lopez v. Velasco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lopez v. Velasco

861 So. 2d 84, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2003 WL 22669012

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 2003·No. No. 1D02-4846·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Workers’ Compensation case, the claimant’s counsel seeks review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims that, without more, informed the parties that the judge did not find reasonable and would not approve the amount of attorneys’ fees sought in connection with the parties’ lump-sum settlement and side stipulation thereto. Upon further consideration of the claimant’s response to this Court’s order to demonstrate why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, we conclude that the JCC’s order is interlocutory and is not appeal-able. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180.

Appeal dismissed.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Workers’ Compensation case, the claimant’s counsel seeks review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims that, without more, informed the parties that the judge did not find reasonable and would not approve the amount of attorneys’ fees sought in connection with the parties’ lump-sum settlement and side stipulation thereto. Upon further consideration of the claimant’s response to this Court’s order to demonstrate why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, we conclude that the JCC’s order is interlocutory and is not appeal-able. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180.

Appeal dismissed.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Lopez v. Velasco, 861 So. 2d 84, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2003 WL 22669012 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

861 So. 2d 84 (Lopez v. Velasco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related