Lopez v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Lopez v. United States

186 F.2d 707

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 22, 1950·No. 12439·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a sentence which appellant contends the District Court had no jurisdiction to impose. The motion was made pursuant to the provisions of § 2255, 28 U.S.C.A.

It was stipulated during the argument of the appeal that the appellant is not in custody under the sentence he is attacking. In fact, the said sentence has been served. Appellant is now in custody under a separate, distinct and unrelated sentence.

Upon authority of Crow v. United States, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 704, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a sentence which appellant contends the District Court had no jurisdiction to impose. The motion was made pursuant to the provisions of § 2255, 28 U.S.C.A.

It was stipulated during the argument of the appeal that the appellant is not in custody under the sentence he is attacking. In fact, the said sentence has been served. Appellant is now in custody under a separate, distinct and unrelated sentence.

Upon authority of Crow v. United States, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 704, the judgment is affirmed.

Lopez v. United States, 186 F.2d 707 (9th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

186 F.2d 707 (Lopez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related