Lopez v. United States
This text of Lopez v. United States (Lopez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7490
HECTOR LOPEZ,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:10-cv-01598-HFF)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hector Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Hector Lopez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 &
Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Lopez v. United States, No.
4:10-cv-01598-HFF (D.S.C. Oct. 13, 2010). We deny Lopez’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lopez v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-united-states-ca4-2011.