Home/Supreme Court/Lopez v. Texas

Lopez v. Texas

378 U.S. 567, 84 S. Ct. 1924, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 854
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket396, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 567 (Lopez v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Texas, 378 U.S. 567, 84 S. Ct. 1924, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 854 (1964).

Opinion

378 U.S. 567 (1964)

LOPEZ
v.
TEXAS.

No. 396, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.

Carlos C. Cadena for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and James E. Barlow for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
Albert Harris, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Florida Division of Corrections
406 F.2d 1 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Joe Edward Smith v. The State of Texas
395 F.2d 958 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Fernandez v. Beto
281 F. Supp. 207 (N.D. Texas, 1968)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
206 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 567, 84 S. Ct. 1924, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-texas-scotus-1964.