Lopez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Lopez v. State

398 S.W.2d 567

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lopez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1142 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 1966·No. No. 38994·Published

Opinion

DICE, Commissioner.

The record has been perfected to show that no variance exists between the complaint and the information as to the date of the commission of the alleged offense.

Our prior opinion reversing the judgment of conviction is withdrawn and the following substituted:

The conviction is for the sale of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $300.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DICE, Commissioner.

The record has been perfected to show that no variance exists between the complaint and the information as to the date of the commission of the alleged offense.

Our prior opinion reversing the judgment of conviction is withdrawn and the following substituted:

The conviction is for the sale of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $300.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Lopez v. State, 398 S.W.2d 567 (Tex. 1966).

Pincite

398 S.W.2d 567 (Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.