Lopez v. State
333 S.W.2d 379, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3085
Opinion
The offense is murder; the punishment, 20 years.
No statement of facts or brief for appellant accompanies the record.
One formal bill of exception recites that appellant challenged a prospective juror because he had served as a juror in the same court on the preceding day. Such a bill does not reflect error. Hunter v. State, 30 Tex.App. 314, 17 S.W. 414, and Benton v. State, 52 Tex.Cr.R. 360, 107 S.W. 838.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopez v. State, 333 S.W.2d 379, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3085 (Tex. 1960).
333 S.W.2d 379 (Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christopher v. State
489 S.W.2d 573 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)