Lopez v. State

12 So. 3d 891, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8368, 2009 WL 1812094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lopez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 So. 2d 46
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2009·No. 2D07-3309·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Patterson v. State, 796 So.2d 572, 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Stancliff v. State, 996 So.2d 259, 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Wyden v. State, 958 So.2d 540, 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Winther v. State, 812 So.2d 527, 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

CASANUEVA, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez v. State, 12 So. 3d 891, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8368, 2009 WL 1812094 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

12 So. 3d 891 (Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. State
796 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Stancliff v. State
996 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Winther v. State
812 So. 2d 527 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wyden v. State
958 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)