Lopez v. State
801 So. 2d 200, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17095, 2001 WL 1538476
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2001·No. No. 4D00-1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals his conviction, arguing that he did not voluntarily and intelligently enter his plea. This issue is not subject to appellate review, however, because appellant did not move in the trial court to withdraw his plea. We therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant’s filing an appropriate motion in the trial court seeking to withdraw his plea. Thiel v. State, 793 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopez v. State, 801 So. 2d 200, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17095, 2001 WL 1538476 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
801 So. 2d 200 (Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Underwood v. State
801 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)