Lopez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lopez v. State

329 So. 2d 35, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14010

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 1976

DocketNo. 74-421

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 329 So. 2d 35 (Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. State, 329 So. 2d 35, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on December 31, 1974 (305 So.2d 268) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed January 14, 1976 (327 So.2d 27) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause with directions;

NOW THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on January 16, 1975 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed in this cause on December 31, 1974 insofar as it is in conflict with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the sentence of the Circuit Court herein sought to be reviewed is reinstated and affirmed in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18, Fla.1976. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on December 31, 1974 (305 So.2d 268) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed January 14, 1976 (327 So.2d 27) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause with directions;

NOW THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on January 16, 1975 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed in this cause on December 31, 1974 insofar as it is in conflict with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the sentence of the Circuit Court herein sought to be reviewed is reinstated and affirmed in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18, Fla.1976. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 So. 2d 35, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack