Lopez v. State
39 Ariz. 60
Opinion
Defendant was informed against for an escape from the Maricopa county branch jail at Tempe, while being held under a commitment for burglary. He has caused the record and the reporter’s transcript of the testimony to he filed, hut has failed to call our attention to any prejudicial error in his trial, and, after looking into the record, we find none.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopez v. State, 39 Ariz. 60 (Ark. 1931).
39 Ariz. 60 (Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.