Lopez v. Smith

Ninth Circuit

Lopez v. Smith

173 F.3d 749, 99 Daily Journal DAR 3499, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2661, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7198

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 12, 1999·No. 97-16987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

173 F.3d 749

Max LOPEZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
G.A. SMITH, Warden; Larry Loo, Chief Medical Officer; A.
Acevedo, Chief Dental Officer; Patterson, Counselor 4A-2R;
R. Keiner, Dentist; M.P. McClure, 4A-2R Appeals
Coordinator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-16987.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 12, 1999.

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lopez v. Smith, 160 F.3d 567 (9th Cir.1998) is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

173 F.3d 749

Max LOPEZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
G.A. SMITH, Warden; Larry Loo, Chief Medical Officer; A.
Acevedo, Chief Dental Officer; Patterson, Counselor 4A-2R;
R. Keiner, Dentist; M.P. McClure, 4A-2R Appeals
Coordinator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-16987.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 12, 1999.

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lopez v. Smith, 160 F.3d 567 (9th Cir.1998) is withdrawn.

Lopez v. Smith, 173 F.3d 749, 99 Daily Journal DAR 3499, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2661, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7198 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

173 F.3d 749 (Lopez v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related