Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 10, 2025
Docket17-0748V
StatusPublished

This text of Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************* JASMIN A. LOPEZ * No. 17-748V * Petitioners, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * Filed: February 14, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************************* W. Anthony Stevens, Jr., Law Offices of Louis W. Flynn, Jr. And Associates, East Windsor, CT, for Petitioner; Colleen Clemons Hartley, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On February 13, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Jasmin Lopez on June 6, 2017. Petitioner alleged that the influenza and/or tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccines she received on October 16, 2014, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table, 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused her to suffer from transverse myelitis (“TM”) and/or multiple sclerosis (“MS”). Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website. Respondent denies that Ms. Lopez’s alleged TM and/or MS were caused-in- fact by the flu and/or Tdap vaccines; and denies that the flu and/or Tdap vaccines caused her any other injury or her current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine- related injury. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A. A lump sum of $39,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement; and

B. A lump sum of $1,750.00,2 representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to petitioner by the State of Connecticut, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and the state of CT, DAS:

State of CT, DAS-Collection Services 450 Columbus Blvd., Suite 1001 Hartford, CT 06103 Reference: LOPEZ, Jasmin 1310548

Petitioners agree to endorse this check to the State of CT, DAS.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

2 This amount represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Connecticut may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the Connecticut Program has made to or on behalf of Jasmin A. Lopez as a result of her alleged vaccine-related injury suffered on or about October 16, 2014, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), (h).

2 In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) JASMIN A. LOPEZ, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) V. ) No. 17-748V ) Special Master Moran SECRETARY OF ) ECF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Jasmin A. Lopez ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to her receipt of the

influenza ("flu") vaccination and/or tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis ("Tdap") vaccination,

which are vaccines contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccination and Tdap vaccination on October 16, 2014.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered Transverse Myelitis ("TM") and/or Multiple

Sclerosis ("MS") as a result of the flu vaccine and/or Tdap vaccine. Petitioner further alleges

that she experienced the residual effects of these conditions for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her conditions. 6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine and/or the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner's

alleged TM or MS; denies that the flu vaccine and/or the Tdap vaccine caused or significantly

aggravated any injury; and denies that petitioner's current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-

related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

A. A lump sum of $39,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLT A account for prompt disbursement to petitioner; and

B. A lump sum of$1,750.00, 1 representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to petitioner by the State of Connecticut, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and the State of CT, DAS:

State of CT, DAS-Collection Services 450 Columbus Blvd., Suite 1001 Hartford, CT 06103 Reference: LOPEZ, Jasmin 1310548

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the State of CT, DAS.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.