Lopez v. McVay

348 S.W.3d 116, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2011 WL 4025640
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 13, 2011
DocketWD 72897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 116 (Lopez v. McVay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. McVay, 348 S.W.3d 116, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2011 WL 4025640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

This is a negligence case. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. One issue is whether the issue of liability was conclusively established by the “admissions” of defense counsel and other evidence. Another issue is whether the trial court should have granted a new trial, given certain allegedly inappropriate comments that defense counsel made during closing argument. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colston v. Bennett
348 S.W.3d 116 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 116, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2011 WL 4025640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-mcvay-moctapp-2011.