Lopez v. McVay

348 S.W.3d 116, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2011 WL 4025640
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. WD 72897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

This is a negligence case. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. One issue is whether the issue of liability was conclusively established by the “admissions” of defense counsel and other evidence. Another issue is whether the trial court should have granted a new trial, given certain allegedly inappropriate comments that defense counsel made during closing argument. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez v. McVay, 348 S.W.3d 116, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2011 WL 4025640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 116 (Lopez v. McVay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colston v. Bennett
348 S.W.3d 116 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)