Lopez v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lopez v. Lopez

266 A.D.2d 71, 698 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 71 (Lopez v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. Lopez, 266 A.D.2d 71, 698 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County [72]*72(Walter Tolub, J.), entered February 10, 1998, inter alia, dissolving the parties’ marriage and directing defendant to pay plaintiff $500 a month maintenance for a period of 7 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the circumstances presented, particularly the limited income available to plaintiff in relation to defendant’s established annual earnings, the challenged maintenance award fairly balances plaintiff’s reasonable needs against defendant’s ability to pay therefor, and is otherwise equitable (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; see, Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36, 52). Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County [72]*72(Walter Tolub, J.), entered February 10, 1998, inter alia, dissolving the parties’ marriage and directing defendant to pay plaintiff $500 a month maintenance for a period of 7 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the circumstances presented, particularly the limited income available to plaintiff in relation to defendant’s established annual earnings, the challenged maintenance award fairly balances plaintiff’s reasonable needs against defendant’s ability to pay therefor, and is otherwise equitable (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; see, Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36, 52). Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 71, 698 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-lopez-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack