Lopez v. Jeter

170 F. App'x 894
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2006
Docket05-10240
StatusUnpublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 170 F. App'x 894 (Lopez v. Jeter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Jeter, 170 F. App'x 894 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Ignacio Champion Lopez, federal prisoner # 15603-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He challenges the district court’s conclusion that he received credit on his state sentence for the time he spent in federal custody pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. He argues that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment when it amended the sentencing court’s judgment by denying the orally ordered credit to his sentence.

Evidence in the record supported the district court’s factual determination that Lopez received credit on his state sentence for the time spent in federal prison pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. Thus, this determination was not clearly erroneous. See Free v. Miles, 333 F.3d 550, 552 (5th Cir.2003). Nor did the district court err in finding as a matter of law that Lopez was not entitled to the credit he sought. Time spent by a prisoner in federal custody for the purpose of appearing in federal court via a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum is not counted towards the federal sentence if that time was credited toward his state sentence. United States v. Brown, 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir.1985); 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kesler v. Salmonson
E.D. Texas, 2021
Vega v. Bergami
W.D. Texas, 2020
Cillitto v. Bergami
W.D. Texas, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-jeter-ca5-2006.