Lopez v. Jarrett

106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 829, 89 Cal. App. 4th 1298
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 14, 2001
DocketC035569
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 829 (Lopez v. Jarrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Jarrett, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 829, 89 Cal. App. 4th 1298 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Plaintiffs and appellants, Ernesto Lopez and Aristeo Solorio, and defendants and respondents, Law Offices of Stanley J. Bell, Stanley J. Bell, Sally Bechthold and Kirk Musacchio, have applied to this court for determination of good faith settlement.

Such a determination is governed by Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6. The aforementioned parties have cited no authority indicating the provisions of section 877.6 apply to the Court of Appeal. Reading section 877.6 in its entirety, it is apparent the statute applies only to the trial court and not to the Court of Appeal.

The application for determination of good faith settlement is denied.

On June 14, 2001, the opinion was modified to read as printed above.

*

Before Sims, Acting P. J., Nicholson, J., and Kolkey, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wang
106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 829 (California Court of Appeal, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 829, 89 Cal. App. 4th 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-jarrett-calctapp-2001.