Lopez v. Howe

Supreme Court

Lopez v. Howe

254 U.S. 613, 65 L. Ed. 438, 41 S. Ct. 63, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1134

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 22, 1920·No. No. 146·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted November 19, 1920. Decided November 22, 1920. Per Curium. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487,498; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 88; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 135; Horn v. Mitchell, 243 U. S. 247. Petition for writ of certiorari herein denied. [614] Mr. Charles Recht for appellant. The Solicitor General, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart and Mr. H. S. Ridgely for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted November 19, 1920. Decided November 22, 1920. Per Curium. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487,498; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 88; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 135; Horn v. Mitchell, 243 U. S. 247. Petition for writ of certiorari herein denied. [614] Mr. Charles Recht for appellant. The Solicitor General, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart and Mr. H. S. Ridgely for appellee.

Lopez v. Howe, 254 U.S. 613, 65 L. Ed. 438, 41 S. Ct. 63, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1134 (1920).

Pincite

254 U.S. 613 (Lopez v. Howe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related