Lopez v. Holder

366 F. App'x 839
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2010
Docket08-70216
StatusUnpublished

This text of 366 F. App'x 839 (Lopez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Holder, 366 F. App'x 839 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Josefina Rosario Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Rosario Lopez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

In her opening brief, Rosario Lopez fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under CAT. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996) (arguments not raised in the opening brief are deemed waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 F. App'x 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-holder-ca9-2010.