Lopez v. Gonzales

225 F. App'x 114
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 2007
Docket06-1710
StatusUnpublished

This text of 225 F. App'x 114 (Lopez v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Gonzales, 225 F. App'x 114 (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Estuardo Vinicio Monzon Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s discretionary denial of his application for adjustment of status. We lack jurisdiction to review any claim that the Board abused its discretion in affirming the denial of adjustment of status. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(a)(2)(B)® (West 2005). Under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (West 2005), we do have “a narrowly circumscribed jurisdiction to resolve constitutional claims or questions of law raised by aliens seeking discretionary relief.” Higuit v. Gonzales, 433 F.3d 417, 419 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2973, 165 L.Ed.2d 955 (2006). However, we find no merit in Monzon Lopez’s alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higuit v. Gonzales
548 U.S. 906 (Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 F. App'x 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-gonzales-ca4-2007.