Lopez v. Doe

608 A.2d 493, 530 Pa. 267, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 367
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 18, 1992
DocketAppeal No. 8 Western District Appeal Docket 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 608 A.2d 493 (Lopez v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lopez v. Doe, 608 A.2d 493, 530 Pa. 267, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 367 (Pa. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is hereby dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

PAPADAKOS, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. McDERMOTT and ZAPPALA, JJ., note their dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 A.2d 493, 530 Pa. 267, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-doe-pa-1992.