Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Eleventh Circuit

Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

644 F. App'x 969

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 2016

DocketNo. 15-12096

StatusPublished

This text of 644 F. App'x 969 (Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security, 644 F. App'x 969 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have reviewed the briefs and the relevant parts of the record. Giving due deference to the Administrative Law Judge’s opportunity to make credibility determinations and responsibility for weighing the evidence, we conclude that the magistrate judge’s determination that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Miguel Lopez’s applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income is correct for the reasons set out in his order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have reviewed the briefs and the relevant parts of the record. Giving due deference to the Administrative Law Judge’s opportunity to make credibility determinations and responsibility for weighing the evidence, we conclude that the magistrate judge’s determination that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Miguel Lopez’s applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income is correct for the reasons set out in his order.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

644 F. App'x 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca11-2016.