Lopez v. Commissioner
This text of 92 F. App'x 571 (Lopez v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Domingo A. Lopez appeals the tax court’s imposition of penalties for negligence and substantial understatement of tax.1 We affirm. The tax court permissibly concluded that Lopez failed to show that his reliance on the advice of his tax attorney, Denis McDevitt, was reasonable.2 McDevitt testified that, he did not “endorse” the investment, and it is unclear whether Lopez even asked him to perform a thorough review. Additionally, the offering documents clearly warned that the investments carried high tax risks. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F. App'x 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-commissioner-ca9-2004.