Lopez v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lopez v. Coleman

265 A.D.2d 454, 696 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10432

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 454 (Lopez v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. Coleman, 265 A.D.2d 454, 696 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated September 29, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

There is a triable issue of fact as to whether negligence on the part of the defendant, if any, contributed to the accident (see, Pekar v Abro Serv., 245 AD2d 139). Accordingly, the [455]*455defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Krausman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated September 29, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

There is a triable issue of fact as to whether negligence on the part of the defendant, if any, contributed to the accident (see, Pekar v Abro Serv., 245 AD2d 139). Accordingly, the [455]*455defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Krausman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 454, 696 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-coleman-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack