Lopez v. City of New York

259 A.D.2d 601, 686 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2473
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated January 30, 1998, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant failed to demonstrate that it did not own the property at the time of the accident, and thus, summary judgment was properly denied. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lopez v. City of New York, 259 A.D.2d 601, 686 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 601 (Lopez v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weldon v. Vepp Realty, LLC
130 A.D.3d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Vanriel v. Lumber Headquarters
271 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)